Now
Everything moving in the standards community
Discussions and publisher posts from every source the feed publishes, newest first. Each entry links to its source; nothing here is a copy of what was said.
Curated by Nicholas J. Dugan.
Sources
- FHIR Chat — 111 messages this week across 31 feeds · last message 5 hours ago
- HL7 Mailing List — 3 messages this week across 2 feeds · last message 37 hours ago
- HL7 Blog — 1 post this week · last post 3 days ago
Feed checked 4 minutes ago. Counts are the feed's own, for the last seven days.
Specification: 1 of 88
Sources: All
Channels: All
Stage: All
Impact: All
More
Columns: All
Showing 1 of 1 (73 before filters) · summarised discussions only
| Question | Next step | Specifications | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Determining what is In scope versus out-of-scope for PAS ver (opens chat.fhir.org) | Should the mapping support Loop 2000E SV3 and the claim.type 'oral' value, or is it out of scope? What determines transformation scope between PAS 2.2.1 and X12 005010 X217? | Implementers should treat SV3 and dental content as out of scope for PAS 2.2.1 to X12 278 5010 transformations, per the IG's supported use cases section. | Scope is determined by two things: X12 Glass documents what is currently mapped, but the spec has moved since the original maps, and a new mapping initiative is ongoing. The PAS 2.2.1 IG 'supported use cases' section lists items out of scope, and it names SV3 and dental as out of scope. Confirmed by a participant that this is the referenced section. Not stated explicitly whether 'oral' claim.type is out of scope. | The new mapping initiative is ongoing; no specific next action is stated in the thread. | Da Vinci PAS 2.2.1, Da Vinci PAS 1.2, X12 278 005010 X217 | — Cites no HL7 Jira item. | Machine summary · unreviewed · claude-haiku-5-5 · analysed Nov 3, 2026 · inferred | Da Vinci PAS | FHIR Chat | 4 messages this week · 4 days ago |
Links open the source, which asks you to sign in if the discussion needs it. This page shows the newest entries the feed returns, not a complete archive. Summaries, including the Impact sentence, are written by a model from the discussion and say so until they are reviewed; they name no one. Stages, Impact categories and Jira statuses come from the thread and from HL7 Jira, not from a work group's formal record. A discussion whose chat has gone quiet stays listed while its Jira items are open or moving.